Mitsubishi Triton v Toyota HiLux - Drive
A clear winner in this equation, coming in about $15,000 less than the HiLux once on-road costs and add-ons are taken into account. The Triton makes do without a reversing camera but scores electric adjustment on the driver’s seat and partial leather seats as standard. Inside Toyota. Front bucket seats are deep and offer better support than the Triton on long trips, while the rear pews are firm and upright. Decent leg and head room for all five pews. No rear air vents and no reach adjustment on the steering wheel. A bland and uninspiring interior which loses out to the marginally-better Toyota. Less rear leg room or head room than the Toyota, plus flat, uncomfortable seats. No rear air vents and no reach adjustment on the steering wheel. Winner: Toyota. Under the bonnet Toyota. The MY14 model HiLux retains an existing 3. 0-litre turbo diesel but scores an updated 5-speed automatic transmission. The HiLux is quicker off the line than the Triton and returns a better fuel reading in reality. Source: www.drive.com.au
